On
August 1, 2012, health plans for most organizations will be required to cover
contraception, “emergency contraceptives,” and sterilization procedures. The
mandate will be extended to non-profit
religious employers
on August 1, 2013. Narrow religious exemptions have been granted, but as Cardinal
Wuerl has pointed out, not even Mother Teresa would qualify for these
exemptions.
In
other words, the Obama administration is forcing institutions affiliated with
the Catholic Church to pay for coverage of contraceptives,
“emergency contraception,” and sterilization. After being pressured by religious groups, the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) tweaked the mandate so that insurance companies would
be forced to provide contraception instead of Catholic institutions themselves.
But Catholic institutions would be paying insurance companies to provide birth
control to employees, so the religious objections of Catholics have not been
resolved. (Besides, since many Catholic companies and dioceses self-insure, the major sticking point
remains for Catholics in a host of cases.)
If
the Church did comply and provided contraception coverage to its employees, it
would signify that the Church’s moral teaching on contraception could be
changed. And the Church would instantly lose all credibility if She reversed
herself on contraception or any of Her other moral teachings; if She could
reverse Herself on one critical teaching at the whim of the state, any of Her
teachings would be mutable.
Accordingly,
the Catholic Church is treating the HHS mandate as a serious blow to religious
freedom. Every single one of the Catholic
bishops in America
has sworn that the Church will not and cannot comply with the Obama administration’s
mandate. President Obama refuses to budge on the matter. The Catholic Church is
now celebrating a “Fortnight for Freedom” – two weeks of prayer and
penance as part of a “great hymn of prayer for our country” – in response to
the HHS mandate.
The
Catholic Church can choose to respond to the HHS mandate in several different
ways. Here is a brief overview of the ways the Church can choose to respond to it.
This list will also examine historical precedents for these choices.
1) The
“Nuclear Option” – Shutdown
If
the Obama administration continues to force church-affiliated institutions to
provide contraception to their employees, the Catholic Church may be forced to
shut many facilities down. Rather than comply with the mandate, church
authorities could shut down schools, hospitals, and charities.
In
recent years, this has already taken place on a small scale. Rather than be forced to cater to homosexual
couples, many affiliates of Illinois Catholic
Charities shut
their doors. Under similar pressure from the state to recognize homosexual
couples, affiliates of Catholic Charities in Boston and Washington D.C. closed their adoption programs.
However,
if Catholic schools and charities closed in large enough numbers, societal
chaos would erupt. Tens of thousands of people are employed by Catholic-affiliated
institutions, and millions of Catholics and
non-Catholics alike
are served by these institutions. The suffering wrought by the decision to
close the Church’s affiliated institutions would be immense.
But
the alternative for the Catholic Church is impossible. This would truly be the
Church’s nuclear option – one She would take only if there were no other
choice.
2) Passive
Resistance
The
Church could take a path of passive resistance – refusing to close affiliated
institutions, while at the same time refusing to pay the fines mandated by the
government as a penalty for not complying with the mandate. This would force
the government to punish these institutions in other ways.
Essentially,
this option would be a form of civil disobedience – namely, the refusal to obey an unjust law. This
has historical precedent in the civil rights movement. Civil rights figures
adopted tactics of passive resistance to fight against racial discrimination, crowding
jails, refusing to pay fines, and not obeying what they (rightfully) considered
to be unjust and discriminatory laws.
This
is a potentially rewarding strategy, but one fraught with peril. The danger is
that the government would be able to effectively punish Catholics without media
or public outcry. In that case, those adopting this strategy would be punished
by the government with little fanfare.
However,
this option could potentially to make the Obama administration look very bad. Catholic
charities punished or shut down by the government, because they refused to deny
a key teaching of their faith, would draw the sympathy of fair-minded outside
supporters, and could spark a massive public outcry.
3) Obama Caves
This,
of course, would be the ideal outcome. President Obama could simply rescind the
HHS mandate regarding Catholics and contraception, and no conflict of religious
liberty would exist.
It
is possible, but very unlikely, that this outcome will occur. If the Church and
Her allies were able to bring enough pressure on Obama, he might be forced to
bend, as he did with the issue of gay marriage. There is the possibility of an
“October surprise” on the part of Obama; a decision to “give in” to the Church
might take place to pacify recalcitrant Catholics near the election, if his
poll numbers were bad enough.
However,
this is very unlikely. Obama and his administration implemented this
contraception decision in an election year. He has since sworn that he will
not compromise on this issue. He and his feminist allies wanted this fight
badly; he chose an election year to implement this decision.
This
outcome would occur only if an incredible amount of pressure was brought to
bear on the President.
4) Paying
the Fines
Those
who refuse to obey the mandate will be penalized with fines. Church businesses
could pay fines (of $2000 for each individual
employee employed by the institution),
so that they would not have to pay insurance companies to cover contraception,
“emergency contraception,” and sterilization.
For
historical comparison, one would have to go back to Elizabethan England. During
the Elizabethan era, refusal to attend established Anglican Church services
resulted in fines. At first, the fines for not attending state-sponsored
services were small. Later, the governments increased the fines to massive
amounts, and only extremely wealthy Catholics could afford to pay those fines.
The
likelihood of Catholic businesses paying fines to the government on a large
scale is slim, for two reasons. The first is that Church businesses simply don’t
have enough money to afford paying the government fines; only wealthy Catholic
businesses could utilize this option. Also, this option would legitimize the
mandate, effectively subordinating religious institutions to the state.
5) The
Bishops Cave
Hypothetically
speaking, the bishops could give in and permit Church-affiliated institutions
to accept the HHS mandate. But there is absolutely no chance that this will
happen.
As
previously noted, every single Catholic bishop in
the United States of America opposes the mandate. Besides, the Church could not
defend Her teaching on contraception if Her institutions were forced to provide
it to their employees. If the Church were to cave on this decision, She would
immediately lose all moral authority.
So what will
happen?
Cardinal Francis George of
Chicago succinctly summarized
the Church’s options, declaring: “A Catholic
institution, so far as I can see right now, will have one of four choices: 1)
secularize itself, breaking its connection to the Church, her moral and social
teachings and the oversight of its ministry by the local bishop. This is a form
of theft. It means the Church will not be permitted to have an institutional
voice in public life. 2) Pay exorbitant annual fines to avoid paying for
insurance policies that cover abortifacient drugs, artificial contraception and
sterilization. This is not economically sustainable. 3) Sell the institution to
a non-Catholic group or to a local government. (I did not examine this option, because this could not be implemented
in all cases, and the institutions in question would not remain Catholic.)
4) Close down.”
So
what will happen if the mandate remains in place? Individual Catholic
businesses will adopt a combination of these paths. A few wealthy businesses
may be able to pay fines to the government. Poorer, smaller Catholic-owned businesses
may be forced to shut down. Charities may continue to operate and refuse to pay
the fines, daring the government to shut them down.
However,
it is difficult to say which option the majority of Church businesses will take,
assuming the mandate remains in place until it is implemented. But this much is
clear. The Obama administration’s HHS mandate is nothing less than a
declaration of war against the Catholic Church and religious liberty – and the
Church will defend Her teachings on the morality of contraception with Her very
life.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Rules for Posting Comments:
1)All commentary is to be respectful.
2)Foul language/crude commentary is prohibited.
3)Use proper punctuation and capitalization.
4)Keep all posts in understandable English.
5)Refrain from personal/ad hominem attacks.
6) Sarcasm, humor, and witty commentary are welcomed.
All posts that violate these rules will be removed.
And the most important rule:
7) All posts are to reflect a spirit of Christian charity.